Human rights lawyer Maduabuchi Idam has strongly criticised African Democratic Congress (ADC) chieftain, Kenneth Okonkwo, over his recent comments on the party’s 2027 presidential ticket arrangement.
Idam, in a statement released on Tuesday, said Okonkwo appeared to be speaking with more emotion than reason, describing his reaction as that of someone who relies heavily on rhetoric rather than careful thinking.
His comments came after Okonkwo opposed the ADC decision to field former Transportation Minister, Rotimi Amaechi, from the South-South as the party’s vice-presidential candidate alongside Atiku Abubakar.
Okonkwo had argued that the South-East should not be left out of the top ticket, insisting that he would not support any presidential arrangement that excludes the region from either the presidency or vice presidency.
Reacting, Idam dismissed the position and questioned the motives behind Okonkwo’s political stance, suggesting that his agitation may not be purely driven by regional interest.
He alleged that Okonkwo may have once hoped to become Atiku Abubakar’s running mate, describing such ambition as unrealistic and politically damaging.
According to him, “Kenneth Okonkwo, who appears to have traded sound reasoning for excessive verbal expression, has spoken again. This time around, he is pushing for a ticket arrangement that includes the South-East either as President or Vice President.”
Idam further argued that while the position may look like regional advocacy on the surface, it could be influenced by personal political ambition rather than genuine concern for fairness.
He also claimed that political influence is measured by electoral value, adding that no serious presidential candidate would take a risk on someone who cannot deliver significant votes.
The lawyer went further to suggest that Okonkwo might find a more suitable political home in another party, hinting that his current approach may not align with the ADC’s direction.
Idam also referenced past political disagreements involving Okonkwo, including his fallout with Labour Party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi, alleging that personal expectations may have played a role in the dispute.
He claimed that rumours surrounding political loyalty in Nigeria often involve personal benefits, although he stressed that such claims remain unverified.
According to him, political principles are truly tested when personal comfort and ambition are at stake, not when expectations are being met.
Idam added that Nigerians should watch closely how political actors shift alliances ahead of future elections, noting that political positions can easily change when interests are involved.